Starting Rotation Rankings Jan 29, 2015 18:24:55 GMT -5 Quote Select PostDeselect PostLink to PostMemberGive GiftBack to Top Post by Minnesota Twins on Jan 29, 2015 18:24:55 GMT -5 I did an analysis using science, and the starting rotation (6 deep) ranking are as follows...1. KC 2. BAL3. MIL (tie for 3rd)4. BOS (tie for 3rd)5. PITT6. CHI7. TOR8. LAD9. PHI10. NYY11. SD12. TEX13. MIN14. DET...and I don't even charge for my content like Keith Law!
Starting Rotation Rankings Jan 29, 2015 18:33:38 GMT -5 Quote Select PostDeselect PostLink to PostMemberGive GiftBack to Top Post by Minnesota Twins on Jan 29, 2015 18:33:38 GMT -5 keep in mind my pitching staff costs about $4.6 mil whereas KC costs more than $22 mil
Starting Rotation Rankings Jan 29, 2015 18:40:47 GMT -5 via mobile Quote Select PostDeselect PostLink to PostMemberGive GiftBack to Top Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 18:40:47 GMT -5 The only thing this has to do with science is that it is a falsifiable list. That said if you switch one and two I am willing to declare it a fact.
Starting Rotation Rankings Jan 30, 2015 9:28:45 GMT -5 Quote Select PostDeselect PostLink to PostMemberGive GiftBack to Top Post by ex-Pittsburgh Pirates on Jan 30, 2015 9:28:45 GMT -5 I did not know "using science" also meant "pulled out of my rear end". But as I consider starting pitching to be my team's weakness, I'll take your ranking under advisement.